Clinical trial setup performance and research activity across the Shelford Group
Source: UKCRD Trust Level Set-Up Report, ukcrd.org (NIHR RDN CPMS data). Five consecutive monthly snapshots — report dates 03 Jun, 03 Jul, 04 Aug, 03 Sep and 05 Oct 2026, each a rolling 6-month window. An earlier snapshot (30 Apr 2026, cut 25 Apr 2026, window since 07 Apr 2025) used the pre-format-change methodology and is shown separately below as a baseline, not part of the trend. No May 2026 snapshot exists on the archive — the site jumps from the 25 Apr cut straight to the 01 Jun cut.
How the three percentages relate: the 90-day figure measures the full elapsed time from approval or site selection (whichever is later) to first participant. The 60-day and 30-day figures split that journey into two consecutive stages, each judged against its own threshold: approval or selection → site opening (which includes local set-up steps such as contracting), and site opening → first participant. Because the stages are assessed separately, the three percentages aren’t nested and needn’t move together. A site can open within 60 days but take longer than 30 days to recruit, or open late and then recruit quickly, so the 60-day and 30-day rates can sit above or below the 90-day rate. Only a study that passes both stage thresholds is guaranteed to meet the 90-day target overall.
Bold teal line: Shelford weighted aggregate. Thinner lines: individual trusts — click a name in the legend to isolate it. Hover a point for the study count (n) behind each percentage; several trusts have small monthly samples, so month-to-month swings can reflect a handful of studies rather than a genuine shift in performance.
Note: the 60-day and 30-day columns cover two consecutive stages (approval or selection → site opening, then site opening → first participant), each measured against its own threshold. Contracting and other local set-up steps fall within the first stage, so they count towards both the 60-day and 90-day columns. See the note above the cards.
| Trust | Studies (n) | % within 90 days | Median days (set-up) | % opening within 60 days | % recruiting within 30 days of opening |
|---|
Report date 30 April 2026, data cut 25 April 2026. Window: since 07 April 2025 (13-month cumulative, pre-format-change methodology).
| Trust | Studies (n) | % within 90 days | Median days (set-up) | % opening within 60 days | % recruiting within 30 days of opening |
|---|
An NIHR Open Data Platform series (12 months to Feb 2026) previously tracked trial set-up performance on this page using a broader, differently-defined dataset; it has been retired in favour of the more current, tightly-specified UKCRD monthly series above.
Sources: NIHR "Global and European Firsts" annual tables (sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/globalandeuropeanfirsts, 2025/26 page, updated 24/08/2026), copied and supplied by the Shelford secretariat; and the UKCRD September 2026 monthly update (ukcrd.org, published 07/10/2026), “Trusts achieving a Global or European First in March – August 2026” table, filtered here to the 2026/27 year to date (1 Apr–31 Aug 2026) and to England-scope entries only (two Scottish entries — Perth Royal Infirmary, NHS Tayside, and Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian — excluded for consistency with the annual England-only totals). Three of the 2026/27 entries are flagged by UKCRD as retrospectively reported and are included. UKCRD republishes this table on a rolling six-month window, so earlier months of 2026/27 will need to be carried forward from previous editions as the window moves on.
"Contributing organisations" counts each named recruiting Trust/provider once, however many Firsts it achieved, and only counts a Shelford trust if it achieved at least one First in that period — GSTT, Manchester and Sheffield Teaching recorded none in either period, and Birmingham has recorded none so far in 2026/27, so they aren't counted among the "7" or "6" above. Organisations are counted at trust level (or practice level for primary care sites), with differently spelt entries for the same trust treated as one. The comparison to Shelford's much higher share of Firsts is the intended point: a smaller set of contributing organisations, delivering a disproportionate share of national output.
| Trust | FY2025/26 Global | FY2025/26 European | FY2025/26 Total | 2026/27 to date Global | 2026/27 to date European | 2026/27 to date Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCLH | 4 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Imperial | 2 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Cambridge | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| King's | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Newcastle | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Oxford | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Birmingham | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GSTT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Manchester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sheffield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shelford total | 13 | 23 | 36 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| England total (all organisations) | 32† | 70† | 102† | 13 | 30 | 43 |
† The UKCRD September 2026 update now states that 33 Global and 72 European Firsts were achieved in England in 2025/26 (105 in total), up from the 32 Global and 71 European in the NIHR annual page used here — most likely because of retrospectively reported Firsts. The FY2025/26 figures in this table have not been changed, because the revised totals are not yet available as a row-level list that can be checked trust by trust; they will be updated when a revised annual table is supplied. Separately, the NIHR page's own summary text states 71 European Firsts for 2025/26, but only 70 distinct rows are present in the table as supplied — one row (Woodstock Bower Group Practice, 31/03/2026) is duplicated rather than being a genuinely distinct 71st entry. Percentages above use 70 as the traceable denominator; if the missing row is recovered, the England European and combined totals should be corrected to 71 and 103 respectively. A handful of dates in the annual source file appear transposed (e.g. day/month or year); these do not affect the Financial Year classification used to build this table and were left as supplied.